Jurisdictions where changes in policy, taxation, regulation, geopolitics, or broader market conditions are influencing wealth mobility dynamics and creating pressure on long-term competitiveness.
This table highlights selected markets experiencing policy, fiscal, regulatory, or structural developments that may affect their attractiveness to globally mobile wealth. Selection is informed by the Global Wealth Mobility Framework together with Henley & Partners’ proprietary client enquiry and application trends across more than 100 nationalities, as well as intelligence gathered through the firm’s extensive global network of private banks, wealth managers, family offices, tax advisors, legal practitioners, intermediaries, and government partners.
As a result, inclusion reflects a combination of structural competitiveness, market relevance, investor demand, policy developments, and observed wealth mobility trends. It should not be interpreted as a ranking of the weakest-performing jurisdictions or as a measure of actual millionaire outflows.

Disclaimer
The Wealth Mobility Competitiveness Scores reflect the relative competitiveness of jurisdictions for globally mobile wealth within the 2026 Global Wealth Mobility Framework. They are directional indicators only and do not measure actual millionaire inflows or outflows, nor should they be interpreted as migration forecasts, a global ranking, or a wealth mobility index.
The Wealth Mobility Classifications are intended to provide context and interpretation rather than establish a league table of jurisdictions. They are informed by the Wealth Mobility Competitiveness Score together with broader qualitative considerations, including investor access, policy developments, geopolitical conditions, market relevance, and observed wealth mobility trends.
For further details, see the full methodology and classification explainer.